| Pakistan Reproductive Health and Family Planning Survey 2000-01 |
| MoPW home | Chapters: 1 2 3 4 5 6 References |
2.1 Age Distribution
Table 2.1 shows the weighted age distribution of the de jure household population, and the sex ratios by five-year age groups.
Table 2.1: Age
and Sex Structure of Household Population
|
Age |
Males |
Females |
Both sexes |
Sex |
|||
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
Ratio |
|
0- 4 |
3548 |
13.6 |
3548 |
14.0 |
7096 |
13.8 |
1.00 |
|
5- 9 |
3706 |
14.2 |
3668 |
14.4 |
7374 |
14.3 |
1.01 |
|
10-14 |
3587 |
13.7 |
3227 |
12.7 |
6814 |
13.2 |
1.11 |
|
15-19 |
2982 |
11.4 |
3145 |
12.4 |
6127 |
11.9 |
0.94 |
|
20-24 |
2363 |
9.1 |
2403 |
9.5 |
4766 |
9.3 |
0.98 |
|
25-29 |
1840 |
7.1 |
1958 |
7.7 |
3798 |
7.4 |
0.93 |
|
30-34 |
1511 |
5.8 |
1472 |
5.8 |
2983 |
5.8 |
1.03 |
|
35-39 |
1299 |
5.0 |
1201 |
4.7 |
2500 |
4.9 |
1.08 |
|
40-44 |
1046 |
4.0 |
980 |
3.9 |
2027 |
3.9 |
1.07 |
|
45-49 |
860 |
3.3 |
607 |
2.4 |
1467 |
2.8 |
1.42 |
|
50-54 |
771 |
3.0 |
1092 |
4.3 |
1862 |
3.6 |
0.71 |
|
55-59 |
613 |
2.3 |
637 |
2.5 |
1249 |
2.4 |
0.96 |
|
60-64 |
750 |
2.9 |
557 |
2.2 |
1308 |
2.5 |
1.35 |
|
65-69 |
407 |
1.6 |
313 |
1.2 |
720 |
1.4 |
1.30 |
|
70-74 |
386 |
1.5 |
293 |
1.2 |
680 |
1.3 |
1.32 |
|
75-79 |
119 |
.5 |
122 |
.5 |
241 |
.5 |
0.98 |
|
80+ |
303 |
1.2 |
202 |
.8 |
505 |
1.0 |
1.50 |
|
Total |
26090 |
100.0 |
25426 |
100.0 |
51516 |
100.0 |
1.03 |
Figure 2.1 shows the
overall age distribution graphically. The age pyramid has a shape that is
typical of a young population with high fertility, but the base is clearly
undercut. The smaller size of the age group below five years has been observed
in other surveys and 1998 population census and is only partly due to a recent
fertility decline. Some of the deficit of the 0-4 year olds is probably caused
by age exaggeration. However, comparing this distribution with the one from the
earlier surveys, it appears that the age displacement problem is less severe in
the PRHFPS.
The very high sex
ratio of 1.42 at age 45-49, and the low ratio of 0.71 for the 50-54 year olds
indicate pronounced out-transference of women beyond the age of eligibility for
the in-depth interview. This seems to be caused by, in certain cases,
mis-reporting of women’s ages in the household questionnaire.
Figure2.1

Table 2.2 shows the trend in the household age distribution from various
sources, starting with the 1981 Census. The age distributions have not changed
very much over the last 20 years. The proportion of the population younger
than 15 has come down to 41.3 percent in the PRHFPS, from 44.5 percent in the
1981 Census, providing some evidence of a fertility decline. The proportion of
young people is higher (47.0 percent) in the PCPS, 1994-95 but this is
probably due to the fact that PCPS, 1994-95 only sampled household with
currently married women.
Table 2.2: Percent Distribution of Household Population by Age Group
|
Age
Group |
Census 1981 |
PDHS 1991 |
PCPS 1994 |
PFFPS 1997 |
Census 1998 |
PRHFPS 2000 |
|
0 – 4 |
15.3 |
13.4 |
16.4 |
14.4 |
14.6 |
13.8 |
|
5 – 9 |
16.0 |
17.4 |
16.9 |
15.4 |
15.7 |
14.3 |
|
10 – 14 |
13.2 |
13.7 |
13.7 |
13.3 |
12.9 |
13.2 |
|
15 – 19 |
9.5 |
10.2 |
9.8 |
11.4 |
10.4 |
11.9 |
|
20 – 24 |
7.6 |
8.1 |
7.6 |
8.6 |
9.1 |
9.3 |
|
25 - 29 |
6.7 |
7.1 |
6.7 |
7.4 |
7.5 |
7.4 |
|
30 - 34 |
5.6 |
5.4 |
5.9 |
5.6 |
6.3 |
5.8 |
|
35 - 39 |
5.1 |
4.6 |
5.5 |
4.7 |
4.8 |
4.9 |
|
40 - 44 |
4.7 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.6 |
4.4 |
3.9 |
|
45 - 49 |
3.7 |
3.0 |
3.4 |
2.9 |
3.5 |
2.8 |
|
50 - 54 |
3.6 |
3.2 |
2.6 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.6 |
|
55 - 59 |
2.0 |
2.4 |
1.7 |
2.7 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
|
60 - 64 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
1.8 |
2.6 |
2.1 |
1.4 |
|
65 and More |
4.3 |
5.0 |
2.7 |
4.3 |
3.4 |
2.8 |
Table 2.3 shows the current marital status of males and females by five-year age group. It is clear that in Pakistani society marriage is still universal for both men and women. The median age at first marriage among ever-married women (25-49 years) is 18 years and still over 50 percent of women are married to their first cousins. (Tabulation will be presented in the main report).
Table 2.3: Percent Distribution of Households Members, by Marital Status and Age
|
Age |
Male
|
Female
|
||||
|
Never Married |
Married |
Widowed/ Divorced/
Separated
|
Never Married |
Married |
Widowed/ Divorced/
Separated
|
|
|
10
– 14 |
99.6 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
99.3 |
0.7 |
0.1 |
|
15
– 19 |
97.1 |
2.6 |
0.2 |
84.8 |
15.0 |
0.2 |
|
20
– 24 |
78.7 |
20.8 |
0.5 |
47.7 |
51.1 |
1.2 |
|
25
– 29 |
44.1 |
55.0 |
0.9 |
17.6 |
81.1 |
1.4 |
|
30
– 34 |
16.5 |
81.7 |
1.8 |
5.4 |
92.1 |
2.5 |
|
35
- 39 |
7.2 |
90.5 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
93.0 |
4.4 |
|
40
- 44 |
2.9 |
94.8 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
91.8 |
6.1 |
|
45
- 49 |
1.4 |
94.3 |
4.3 |
2.4 |
89.2 |
8.4 |
|
50
- 54 |
1.3 |
93.5 |
5.2 |
0.9 |
83.6 |
15.4 |
|
55
- 59 |
0.9 |
89.8 |
9.3 |
0.5 |
75.0 |
24.6 |
|
60
- 64 |
2.0 |
88.5 |
9.5 |
1.4 |
65.1 |
33.5 |
|
65
and More |
0.7 |
79.6 |
19.8 |
0.8 |
38.1 |
61.1 |
|
Total |
50.8 |
46.2 |
3.0 |
41.4 |
51.2 |
7.4 |
|
Number |
9565 |
8703 |
569 |
7534 |
9332 |
1344 |
The proportions never married can be used to calculate the singulate mean age at marriage. The singulate mean ages at marriage for men and women are estimated to be 27.1 and 22.7 years, respectively. Table 2.4 and the corresponding figure 2.2 show trends in singulate mean age at marriage and indicate that age at marriage for both sexes continues to rise over time. There is little indication of narrowing in the gap between male and female singulate mean age at marriage.
Table 2.4: Trends in Singulate Mean Age at Marriage for Males and Females (Years)
|
Survey |
Census
1951 |
Census
1961 |
Census
1972 |
PFS
1975 |
Census
1981 |
PCPS
1985 |
PDHS
1991 |
PFFPS
1997 |
PRHFPS
2000 |
|
Male |
22.3 |
23.6 |
24.9 |
25.3 |
25.0 |
25.3 |
26.3 |
26.5 |
27.1 |
|
Female |
16.9 |
18.1 |
19.8 |
19.9 |
20.7 |
20.7 |
21.6 |
22.0 |
22.7 |
Figure 2.2
Trends in Singulate Mean Age at
Marriage
